M. Lazic
To Win
S. Napolitano
To Win
Stefano Napolitano vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L W W L L L
Form
L L L W L L L L L LHead-2-Head: Napolitano 1 - 1 Gimeno-Traver
They have played 4 sets in total, with Napolitano winning 2 and Gimeno-Traver winning 2. The last match between Napolitano and Gimeno-Traver was at the Biella Challenger, 18-09-2018, First, Clay with Stefano Napolitano getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stefano Napolitano | 1 |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | 1 |
Biella Challenger(18-09-2018)
| Napolitano | Stats | Gimeno-Traver |
|---|---|---|
| 33% (2-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 449 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 121 | Highest Rank | 48 |
| 30 | Age | 39 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 24 |
| 54% (342-292) | Career Total W/L | 57% (625-479) |
| $494,215 | Career Prize Money | $1,102,200 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
27 Apr 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Keys VS Vekic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Napolitano VS Gimeno-Traver H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-3 |
Stats 
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Stefano Napolitano
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
Napolitano VS Gimeno-Traver H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 22 | Games Won | 22 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:47:47 | Average Match Time | 1:47:47 |
| 59% (94/158) | 1st Serve % | 64% (88/137) |
| 63% (59/94) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (54/88) |
| 50% (32/64) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (24/49) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (7/15) |
| 43% (59/137) | Return Points Win % | 42% (67/158) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Stefano Napolitano Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Stefano Napolitano
49%
(
42 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
20
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
36 of
43)
61%
(
27 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rodrigo Alujas
Player
Stefano Napolitano
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
36 of
43)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Stefano Napolitano
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Robin Catry
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
5
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
27 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Leonardo Aguilar
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
4 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Stefano Napolitano
64%
(
84 of
132)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
8
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
2
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
38%
(
50 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
128
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Stefano Napolitano
53%
(
50 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Stefano Napolitano
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
27 of
34)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Stefano Napolitano
56%
(
60 of
108)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
9
Aces
11
9
Double Faults
3
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Stefano Napolitano
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Gimeno-Traver Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
37%
(
18 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mario Vilella Martinez
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Galovic
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Pol Toledo Bague
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabien Reboul
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
12
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (342/292) | Win/Loss | 57% (625/479) |
| 54% (787/684) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (1415/1184) |
| 51% (7202/6860) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12975/12022) |
| 58% (96/70) | Hard Win/Loss | 34% (29/56) |
| 53% (162/144) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (578/369) |
| 51% (71/67) | Indoor Hard W/L | 27% (12/32) |
| 54% (13/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 21% (6/22) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 2237 | Aces Total | 2684 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 933 | Total Double Faults | 2209 |
| 1:18:37 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 506.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 586.28 |
| 60% (20639/34559) | 1st Serve % | 59% (29576/49868) |
| 70% (14349/20639) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (20559/29576) |
| 51% (7091/13920) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (10099/20308) |
| 41% (1414/3414) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (2075/4983) |
| 39% (13955/35565) | Return Points Win % | 39% (19916/50722) |
| 47% (17/19) | Slam W/L | 30% (17/40) |
| 50% (7/7) | Masters W/L | 46% (31/36) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 38% (12/20) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (140/159) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (179/170) | Challenger W/L | 61% (343/219) |
| 63% (127/76) | Futures W/L | 81% (92/21) |
| 54% (335/619) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (605/1050) |
| 43% (3/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 28% (11/40) |
| 53% (109/206) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (175/372) |
| 49% (100/204) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (196/355) |
| 83% (335/279) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (597/521) |
| 17% (335/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (597/73) |
| 21% (299/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (505/100) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
